Reading Time: 5 minutes
Many questions have been raised – and continue to be – about the movement known as Black Lives Matter and its pursuit of social justice.
But the question no one seems to be asking is one which, in my humble opinion, is the most fundamental of all:
What does it actually mean that black lives “matter” and why should it matter to me?
It is a question that is important to consider because to assert that “black lives matter” (or “all lives matter” if you prefer), is to apply the universal assumption that human life in general is inherently valuable if for no other reason than that it is human life.
But what is it about human life that elevates it to this particular level of appreciation and esteem?
Against whose standard of measure is valuable defined? Is that standard objective or subjective? If objective, then, by what authority are we obligated to acknowledge said standard? And if subjective, who then determines when, if, or how this standard of worth changes and to what degree?
“When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers, the moon and the stars, which You have ordained; what is man that You take thought of him, and the son of man that You care for him? Yet You have made him a little lower than God, and You crown him with glory and majesty!” – Psalm 8:3-5 (NASB)
As mantras go, “blacklivesmatter” might make for a good hashtag on social media, but there is more to it than that.
Much more.
For to declare that a thing “matters” – whether it be a human life or a set of collection of antique jewelry – is to ascribe to that thing a degree of significance or worth that is grounded in a preconceived idea of what it means for something to “matter”.
“Man is an exception, whatever else he is. If he is not the image of God, then he is a disease of the dust.” – G.K. Chesterton
Ask anyone you know if a certain person or thing is of any importance to them and not only will you receive a definitive answer but, more than likely, they will give you the reason why as well (whether the answer is yes or no).
And it is the why of this proposition that “black lives matter” that no one seems to be talking about.
I live in a suburb of Atlanta where it is not unusual to see deer roaming about this time of year. Mornings are dark longer now, so I’m more alert than usual when driving into work, as deer have a tendency to dart into the road as if out of nowhere.
Every now and then, not often, I’ll notice a deer carcass lying on the side of the road. In that moment, I may spend a second or two in compassionate contemplation about the events that ultimately led to the animal’s demise.
Questions such as: How was it killed? Did it endure much suffering before it died? What was it doing so close to the road in the first place?
You know, thoughts like that.
But what I do not spend time contemplating is whether I should pull my car over to see if the deer can be revived by performing CPR. I do not think to dial 911 to request an ambulance so that the remnants of the deer can be transported to the county morgue and autopsied. Nor do I bother to contact the animal’s next of kin so that funeral arrangements can be made.
No, the most attention that poor deer will get from me is a passing glance as I continue on my way into the office.
Why?
It’s simple, really.
The deer didn’t “matter” to me.
Not because it wasn’t my deer, mind you, but because it was a deer.
Now, before you go reporting me to PETA or accusing me of being some insensitive, animal-hating conservative nut job, please understand that the previous illustration is neither to suggest, infer, nor imply that animals do not matter.
They do.
In fact, you may be surprised to learn just how much Scripture has to say about how we are to treat animals as the creations of God they are.
For example:
“Six days you are to do your work, but on the seventh day you shall cease from labor so that your ox and your donkey may rest…” – Exodus 23:12a (NASB)
There are other texts that come to mind as well (Deuteronomy 25:4; Proverbs 12:10; Luke 12:6).
But though it is true that animals are created by God, they are not created in the image of God (imago Dei). Among the myriad creations formed by the hand of God, only human beings can lay claim to this unique distinction (Genesis 1:27).
Which brings us back to the original question, doesn’t it?
“If we ever deny our unique status in creation as God’s only image-bearers, we will soon begin to depreciate the value of human life, will tend to see humans as merely a higher form of animal, and will begin to treat others as such. We will also lose much of our sense of meaning in life.” – Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine, p. 450
You see, the truth, when all is said and done, is that you cannot arbitrarily assert that black lives matter without also offering an apologetic as to why. For to declare, as if in a vacuum, that black lives have significance is of no real profit unless the argument is posited within the context of objective truth.
Otherwise, the discourse is reduced to nothing more than subjective opinions and ad hominem conjecture, the result of which is tantamount to running on a philosophical treadmill as the dialogue becomes so circular and unproductive, that it just goes on and on and on getting no one anywhere.
“Christianity is a philosophy – though not a rationalistic one because we have not worked it out beginning from ourselves. Rather, God has told us the answers. In this sense it is the true philosophy, for it gives right answers to man’s philosophic and intellectual questions.” – Francis Schaeffer (as cited in Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen, pp. 241-242)
Any conversation about the value of human life, whether it be with regard to social injustice, abortion, or child slavery, must start with God and with His objective construct of why human life matters.
That the issue of the significance of human life is deemed by many to be worthy of protest in its various and sundry forms, is only because God, who is the Author of all life, has attributed significance to it.
“Know that the Lord Himself is God; it is He who has made us, and not we ourselves.” – Psalm 100:3a (NASB)
It is the same today as it was thousands of years ago, when God declared holy the ground on which Moses stood as he encountered the glory of God at the burning bush (Exodus 3:5).
Only God could declare sacred and hallowed [קֹדֶשׁ] something as useless and expendable as the dirt that Moses’ worn out sandals had come in contact with in that one extraordinary moment.
Conclusion
Human life matters because, in our humanity, we bear the image of the One who gives life to each of us (1 Corinthians 3:16-17).
That we, as human beings, are of a particular race, ethnicity, or nationality is of no significance given that even those aspects of our earthly existence are sovereignly ordained by God, so neither you nor I have anything to boast of in ourselves (Acts 17:26).
Not our race.
Not our ethnicity.
Not our individual socio-cultural experiences.
Nothing.
“But may it never be that I would boast, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.” – Galatians 6:14 (NASB)
The question of why black lives matter is indivisible from the annunciation that black lives matter.
It is an attestation that demands an apologetic because, at its core, it is an existential inquiry that invariably points us to God and to His righteous standard of how mankind should relate both to Himself and to one another (Exodus 20:1-17; Ecclesiastes 12:13-14; Matthew 5:38-48; John 13:34-35).
With this in mind, as followers of the God of all life, we must be prepared to respond to subjective philosophical hashtags with the objective biblical hermeneutic that mankind is not, as Chesterton stated, merely a “disease of the dust”.
Humbly in Christ,
Darrell
As usual, well said, Darrell.
Thank you, Ken.
Thank you for your thoughts. Race according to color is a construct of Man but God has said there are but two races, tthe who are in Adam and those in Christ. God’s word and the Spirt unify his people. I don’t know you nor do you know me but there is unity here.
Soli De Gloria!
The Reformed Farmer
I concur completely with you, brother. There is no such thing as ‘race’. There is only ethnicity (Acts 17:26). Thank you for your encouragement as there indeed is unity there.
SDG!
Darrell
I really concur with your analysis of the “kneeling down” during the National Anthem”; especially the part about the many abortions performed daily on black babies, and I wait patiently for the day when all Americans will realize that this is wrong!
Thank you, Elaine, for taking the time to share your thoughts. I do appreciate it. In detailing the “list” I posted to my Facebook page that was later used in an article published by Kira Davis on redstate.com, the overarching goal was to point out the hypocrisy, as I see it, that is clearly being manifested in the selective indignation of the vast majority of blacks who support the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The Star Spangled Banner has been America’s national anthem for 85 years, so the timing of this “outrage” is curious to say the least. Why take a knee to bring attention to police-involved killing of black people but not when black people murder one another? Again, thank you for taking the time to read my thoughts and to share your own. The Lord bless you and yours.
– DBH
Only one race. The human race. We must emphasize this fact at every opportunity.
Thank you for the comments on abortion.
The other lives taken are a great sadness and significance but the unborn are defenseless and innocent of offense.
Hey Darrell,
Good writing as usual. As a follow up to my comment on your FB page, I do think image bearing is very much the apologetic for BLM supporters, particular Christian supporters. As I mentioned, they have hinged their arguments for involvement precisely on this issue. And I’m talking about solidly Reformed folks too. Consider my brother’s argument here who is a recent graduate of WTS.
http://reformedmargins.com/black-body-made-image-god/
I think the problem lies in the what and not the why. In other words, in the affirmation of black lives having value as image bearers, counter-productive means are employed that actually have the impact of devaluing lives by neglecting the full range of what makes our lives matter. Does that makes sense? I’ve been meaning to write a post as a follow up to the link below regarding my concern that so much emphasis has been image bearing that that it skews the whole picture. It fell by the wayside but I think I might just go swing the car around and get it, lol.
https://theothoughts.com/2016/09/03/another-look-at-racial-tension-and-stuff-that-divides-christs-church/
Hey, Lisa, and thank you.
Yes, your comment makes perfect sense. Absolutely. I’m on the same page with you there, my sister. 🙂 I guess what I’m seeing is there’s such an emphasis being placed on the ethnicity aspect of imago Dei that the message of *how* God created us is exalted above the message *that* He created us. I guess I don’t understand, if in fact they are coming from the standpoint of our being image-bearers, why they believe such tactics as some of the confrontational protestations we’ve been seeing will be effectual in any way at changing people’s hearts, which is the complete opposite approach that Christ employed.
A belated Merry Christmas and an early Happy New Year to you and yours. Enjoyed the mental exercise and look forward to the next workout.
Blessings
Greetings, Billy, and thanks so much for the kind words of encouragement. I sincerely appreciate it, brother. Same to you (albeit belated) and my best wishes to you and yours for God’s best in the coming New Year. 🙂